Regular use of computers can have an effect on student performance on standardized tests, according to a new study by researchers at Boston College and the University of Massachusetts at Lowell.
Analyzing test performance and computer uses of 986 fourth grade students from 55 classrooms in nine Massachusetts school districts, the study found that the more regularly students use computers to write papers for school, the better they performed on the Massachusetts Comprehensive Assessment Systems (MCAS) English/Language Arts exam. This positive effect occurred despite the fact that students were not allowed to use computers for the test.
Conversely, the study found that students' recreational use of computers to play games, explore the Internet for fun, or chat with friends at home had a negative effect on students' MCAS reading scores. Similarly, students' use of computers to create PowerPoint presentations was also negatively associated with MCAS writing scores.
This study of students' MCAS performance is part of the "Use, Support and Effect of Instructional Technology" (USEIT) study conducted by the Technology and Assessment Study Collaborative of the Lynch School of Education at Boston College. Funded by the US Department of Education, USEIT is a three-year assessment of educational technology that occurred across 22 Massachusetts districts.
The MCAS achievement component of USEIT is the most sophisticated analysis of the relationships between students' computer use and test performance conducted to date. Building on several shortcomings of past research on this topic, this study collected detailed measures of a variety of student uses of computers in and out of school, controlled for differences in home learning environments, separated effects of teachers' instructional practices, and controlled for differences in prior achievement by using third grade MCAS scores.
In addition to analyzing the effect of a variety of uses of computers on students' total MCAS scores, this study also examined the sub-scores provided by the MCAS test.
At a time when standardized testing is playing an increasingly important role in shaping the learning experiences of students and instructional practices of teachers, the researchers believe this study provides evidence that students' computer use does have an impact on student achievement as measured by tests like MCAS. More importantly, they say, the study demonstrates that different uses of computers have different effects on student learning.
"Specifically, this study finds that students' use of computers throughout the writing process had a statistically significant positive effect on MCAS writing scores," said the study's director, Michael Russell of BC's Lynch School of Education. "Using computers simply to type in final drafts of essays, however, had no effect on students' test performance. These findings are consistent with past research and demonstrate the importance of allowing students to use computers to produce rough drafts, edit their papers, and to produce final drafts."
This study also indicates that using computers for recreational purposes had a negative effect on test performance, particularly for reading scores. The authors speculate that this occurs because students who spend more time using computers for recreational purposes at home may spend less time reading at home.
Similarly, the study found that use of computers in school to create presentations was negatively associated with writing test scores. According to the researchers, this negative relationship may result from students spending less time writing during class time and more time creating and revising multimedia projects that contain relatively small amounts of written work. In essence, time spent creating presentations may detract from time available during class to develop students' writing skills.
"These findings are important for two reasons," said Russell. "First, at a time when schools are under increased pressure to raise test scores, yet are also facing budget shortfalls, this study provides evidence that investments in computers can have positive effects on student achievement. Second, it shows that teachers and students must be thoughtful about how computers are used and what types of learning they expect to impact."
"When examining the effect of computer use on student learning, it is important to consider how well a specific use is aligned with the measure of learning," added the study's lead author, Laura O'Dwyer of the Graduate School of Education at UMass Lowell, formerly a researcher at Boston College. "While this study found that use of computers to create presentations was negatively associated with writing scores, it does not mean that students should not be creating presentations with computers. Creating presentations may be a positive learning experience, but such effects are not captured by a test like MCAS that measures reading and writing skills."
Adds BC researcher Damian Bebell, the study's third author, "Although this study finds some interesting effects of students' use of computers, teachers in this study generally did not use technology to teach. As more and more schools, districts, and states provide teachers and students with their own laptops, it will be interesting to see if teachers are able to use technology more in the classroom and if these uses add to the effects of student technology use."
1. Weinstein A, Lejoyeux M. Internet addiction or excessive Internet use. The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse. 2010 Aug;36(5 ):277–83.[PubMed]
2. Beard KW. Internet addiction: a review of current assessment techniques and potential assessment questions. CyberPsychology & Behavior. 2005 Feb;8(1 ):7–14.[PubMed]
3. Chou C, Condron L, Belland JC. A review of the research on Internet addiction. Educational Psychology Review. 2005 Dec;17(4 ):363–88.
4. Douglas AC, Mills JE, Niang M, Stepchenkova S, Byun S, Ruffini C, et al. Internet addiction: meta-synthesis of qualitative research for the decade 1996-2006. Computers in Human Behavior. 2008 Sep;24(6 ):3027–44.
5. Wolfling K, Buhler M, Lemenager T, Morsen C, Mann K. Gambling and internet addiction. Review and research agenda. Der Nervenarzt. 2009 Sep;80(9 ):1030–9.[PubMed]
6. Petersen KU, Weymann N, Schelb Y, Thiel R, Thomasius R. Pathological Internet use - epidemiology, diagnostics, co-occurring disorders and treatment. Fortschritte Der Neurologie Psychiatrie. [Review] 2009 May;77(5 ):263–71.[PubMed]
7. Peukert P, Sieslack S, Barth G, Batra A. Internet- and computer game addiction: Phenomenology, comorbidity, etiology, diagnostics and therapeutic implications for the addictives and their relatives. Psychiatrische Praxis. 2010 Jul;37(5 ):219–24.[PubMed]
8. Widyanto L, Griffiths MD. 'Internet addiction': a critical review. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction. 2006 Jan;4(1 ):31–51.
9. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. (4th ed., text rev.) Washington, DC: 2000. Author.
10. Young KS. Internet addiction: The emergence of a new clinical disorder. 104th annual meeting of the American Psychological Association; August 11 1996; Toronto, Canada.
11. American Psychiatric Association. DSM-5 Publication Date Moved to May 2013. 2009 [cited 2011 August 21]; [Press release]. Available from: http: //www.psych.org/MainMenu/Newsroom/ NewsReleases/2009NewsReleases/DSM-5-Publication-Date- Moved-.aspx .
12. Block JJ. Issues for DSM-V: Internet addiction. The American Journal of Psychiatry. 2008 Mar;165(3 ):306–7. [Editorial] [PubMed]
13. Pies R. Should DSM-V designate "Internet addiction" a mental disorder? Psychiatry. 2009 Feb;6(2 ):31–7.[PMC free article][PubMed]
14. O'Brien CP. Commentary on Tao et al. (2010): Internet addiction and DSM-V. Addiction. [Comment/Reply] 2010 Mar;105(3 ):565.
15. Czincz J, Hechanova R. Internet addiction: Debating the diagnosis. Journal of Technology in Human Services. 2009 Oct;27(4 ):257–72.
16. Young KS. Caught in the net: how to recognize the signs of Internet addiction and a winning strategy for recovery. New York: J. Wiley; 1998.
17. Young KS. Internet addiction: the emergence of a new clinical disorder. CyberPsychology & Behavior. 1998 Fal ;1(3 ):237–44.
18. Kratzer S, Hegerl U. Is "Internet Addiction" a disorder of its own? A study on subjects with excessive internet use. Psychiatrische Praxis. 2008 Mar;35(2 ):80–3.[PubMed]
19. Grant JE, Potenza MN, Weinstein A, Gorelick DA. Introduction to behavioral addictions. The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse. 2010 Aug;36(5 ):233–41.[PMC free article][PubMed]
20. American Society of Addiction Medicine. Public Policy Statement: Definition of Addiction. 2011 [cited 2011 August 21]; http: //www.asam.org/1DEFINITION_OF_ ADDICTION_LONG_4-11.pdf. Public Policy Statement: Definition of Addiction. 2011 [cited 2011 Augus.
21. Davis RA. A cognitive behavioral model of pathological internet use (PIU) Computers in Human Behavior. 2001;17(2 ):187–95.
22. Dowling NA, Quirk KL. Screening for Internet dependence: Do the proposed diagnostic criteria differentiate normal from dependent Internet use? CyberPsychology & Behavior. 2009 Feb;12(1 ):21–7.[PubMed]
23. Caplan SE. Problematic Internet use and psychosocial well-being: development of a theory-based cognitive-behavioral measurement instrument. Computers in Human Behavior. 2002;18(5 ):553–75.
24. Winkler A, Dörsing B. Treatment of internet addiction disorder: a first meta-analysis [Diploma thesis] Marburg: University of Marburg; 2011.
25. Byun S, Ruffini C, Mills JE, Douglas AC, Niang M, Stepchenkova S, et al. Internet addiction: metasynthesis of 1996-2006 quantitative research. CyberPsychology & Behavior. 2009 Apr;12(2 ):203–7.[PubMed]
26. Demetrovics Z, Szeredi B, Rozsa S. The three-factor model of Internet addiction: the development of the Problematic Internet Use Questionnaire. Behavior Research Methods. 2008;40(2 ):563–74.[PubMed]
27. Meerkerk G, Van Den Eijnden R, Vermulst A, Garretsen H. The Compulsive Internet Use Scale (CIUS): some psychometric properties. CyberPsychology & Behavior. 2009 Feb;12(1 ):1–6.[PubMed]
28. Chakraborty K, Basu D, Kumar K. Internet addiction: Consensus, controversies, and the way ahead. East Asian Archives of Psychiatry. 2010 Sep;20(3 ):123–32.[PubMed]
29. Young KS, Nabuco de Abreu C. Internet Addiction: A handbook and guide to evaluation and treatment. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons Inc; 2011.
30. Young KS, Griffin-Shelley E, Cooper A, O'Mara J, Buchanan J. Online infidelity: A new dimension in couple relationships with implications for evaluation and treatment. Sexual Addiction & Compulsivity. 2000;7(1-2 ):59–74.
31. Cooper A, Putnam DE, Planchon LA, Boies SC. Online sexual compulsivity: getting tangled in the net. Sexual Addiction & Compulsivity. 1999;6(2 ):79–104.
32. Grohol JM. Internet addiction guide. Internet addiction guide. 1999 [updated 2005, April 16; cited 2011 April 20]; Available from: http: //psychcentral.com/ netaddiction/
33. Linden DJ. The Compass of Pleasure: How Our Brains Make Fatty Foods, Orgasm, Exercise, Marijuana, Generosity, Vodka, Learning, and Gambling Feel So Good. Viking Adult. 2011.
34. Gabor Maté MD. In the Realm of Hungry Ghosts: Close Encounters with Addiction. North Atlantic Books. 2010.
35. Bai Y-M, Lin C-C, Chen J-Y. Internet Addiction Disorder Among Clients of a Virtual Clinic. Psychiatric Services. 2001;52(10 ):1397. [Letter] [PubMed]
36. Ko C-H, Liu G-C, Hsiao S, Yen J-Y, Yang M-J, Lin W-C, et al. Brain activities associated with gaming urge of online gaming addiction. Journal of Psychiatric Research. 2009;43(7 ):739–47.[PubMed]
37. Amichai-Hamburger Y, Ben-Artzi E. Loneliness and Internet use. Computers in Human Behavior. 2003;19(1 ):71–80.
38. Eisen S, Lin N, Lyons M, Scherrer J, Griffith K, True W, et al. Familial influences on gambling behavior: an analysis of 3359 twin pairs. Addiction. 1998 Sep;1998:1375–84.[PubMed]
39. Grant JE, Brewer JA, Potenza MN. The neurobiology of substance and behavioral addictions. CNS Spectrums. 2006. 2006 Dec;11(12 ):924–30.[PubMed]
40. Dong G, Lu Q, Zhou H, Zhao X. Precursor or sequela: pathological disorders in people with Internet addiction disorder. Public Library of Science One [serial on the Internet] 2011;6(2 ) Available from: http: //www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal. pone.0014703 . [PMC free article][PubMed]
41. Young KS. Internet Addiction: Symptoms, Evaluation, And Treatment. Innovations in Clinical Practice [serial on the Internet]. 1999;17 Available from: http: //treatmentcenters.com/downloads/ internet-addiction.pdf .
42. Arisoy O. Internet addiction and its treatment. Psikiyatride Guncel Yaklasimlar. 2009;1(1 ):55–67.
43. Atmaca M. A case of problematic Internet use successfully treated with an SSRI-antipsychotic combination. Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology & Biological Psychiatry. 2007 May;31(4 ):961–2. [Letter] [PubMed]
44. Huang X-q, Li M-c, Tao R. Treatment of Internet addiction. Current Psychiatry Reports. 2010 Oct ;12(5 ):462–70.[PubMed]
45. Sattar P, Ramaswamy S. Internet gaming addiction. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry. 2004 Dec;49(12 ):871–2.
46. Wieland DM. Computer addiction: implications for nursing psychotherapy practice. Perspectives in Psychiatric Care. 2005 Oct-Dec;41(4 ):153–61.[PubMed]
47. Dell'Osso B, Hadley S, Allen A, Baker B, Chaplin WF, Hollander E. Escitalopram in the treatment of impulsive-compulsive Internet usage disorder: an open-label trial followed by a double-blind discontinuation phase. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry. 2008 Mar;69(3 ):452–6.[PubMed]
48. Han DH, Hwang JW, Renshaw PF. Bupropion sustained release treatment decreases craving for video games and cue-induced brain activity in patients with Internet video game addiction. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology. 2010 Aug;18(4 ):297–304.[PubMed]
49. Han DH, Lee YS, Na C, Ahn JY, Chung US, Daniels MA, et al. The effect of methylphenidate on Internet video game play in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Comprehensive Psychiatry. 2009 May-Jun;50(3 ):251–6.[PubMed]
50. Shapira NA, Goldsmith TD, Keck PE , Jr, Khosla UM, McElroy SL. Psychiatric features of individuals with problematic Internet use. Journal of affective disorders. 2000 Jan-Mar;57(1-3 ):267–72.[PubMed]
51. Bostwick JM, Bucci JA. Internet sex addiction treated with naltrexone. Mayo Clinic Proceedings. 2008;83(2 ):226–30.[PubMed]
52. Greenfield DN. Suchtfalle Internet. Hilfe fuer Cyberfreaks, Netheads und ihre Partner. Virtual addiction: Zuerich: Walter. 2000.
53. Lanjun Z. The applications of group mental therapy and sports exercise prescriptions in the intervention of Internet addiction disorder. Psychological Science (China) 2009 May;32(3 ):738–41.
54. Miller WR, Rollnick S. In: Motivational interviewing: preparing people for change. 2nd ed. Miller WR, Rollnick S, editors. New York: Guilford Press; 2002.
55. Miller NH. Motivational interviewing as a prelude to coaching in healthcare settings. Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing. 2010 May-Jun;25(3 ):247–51.[PubMed]
56. Burke BL, Arkowitz H, Menchola M. The efficacy of motivational interviewing: a meta-analysis of controlled clinical trials. Journal of consulting and clinical psychology. 2003 Oct;71(5 ):843–61.[PubMed]
57. Meyers RJ, Miller WR, Smith JE. Community reinforcement and family training (CRAFT) In: Meyers RJ, Miller WR, editors. A community reinforcement approach to addiction treatment. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press; US; 2001. pp. 147–60.
58. Kim J-U. A reality therapy group counseling program as an Internet addiction recovery method for college students in Korea. International Journal of Reality Therapy. 2007 Spr ;26(2 ):3–9.
59. Kim J-U. The effect of a R/T group counseling program on the Internet addiction level and self-esteem of Internet addiction university students. International Journal of Reality Therapy. 2008 Spr; 27(2 ):4–12.
60. Twohig MP, Crosby JM. Acceptance and Commitment Therapy as a treatment for problematic Internet pornography viewing. Behavior Therapy. 2010 Sep;41(3 ):285–95.[PubMed]
61. Abreu CN, Goes DS. Psychotherapy for Internet addiction. In: Young KS, de Abreu CN, editors. Internet addiction: A handbook and guide to evaluation and treatment. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons Inc; US; 2011. pp. 155–71.
62. Young KS. Cognitive behavior therapy with Internet addicts: treatment outcomes and implications. CyberPsychology & Behavior. 2007 Oct;10(5 ):671–9.[PubMed]
63. Cao F-L, Su L-Y, Gao X-P. Control study of group psychotherapy on middle school students with Internet overuse. Chinese Mental Health Journal. 2007 May;21(5 ):346–9.
64. Li G, Dai X-Y. Control study of cognitive-behavior therapy in adolescents with Internet addiction disorder. Chinese Mental Health Journal. 2009 Jul;23(7 ):457–70.
65. Zhu T-m, Jin R-j, Zhong X-m. Clinical effect of electroacupuncture combined with psychologic interference on patient with Internet addiction disorder. Chinese Journal of Integrated Traditional & Western Medicine. 2009 Mar;29(3 ):212–4.[PubMed]
66. Orzack MH, Orzack DS. Treatment of computer addicts with complex co-morbid psychiatric disorders. Cyberpsychology & Behavior. 1999;2(5 ):465–73.[PubMed]
67. Du Y-s, Jiang W, Vance A. Longer term effect of randomized, controlled group cognitive behavioural therapy for Internet addiction in adolescent students in Shanghai. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry. 2010;44(2 ):129–34.[PubMed]
68. Fang-ru Y, Wei H. The effect of integrated psychosocial intervention on 52 adolescents with Internet addiction disorder. Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology. 2005 Aug;13(3 ):343–5.
69. Orzack MH, Voluse AC, Wolf D, Hennen J. An ongoing study of group treatment for men involved in problematic Internet-enabled sexual behavior. CyberPsychology & Behavior. 2006 Jun;9(3 ):348–60.[PubMed]
70. Rong Y, Zhi S, Yong Z. Comprehensive intervention on Internet addiction of middle school students. Chinese Mental Health Journal. 2006 Jul;19(7 ):457–9.
71. Shek DTL, Tang VMY, Lo CY. Evaluation of an Internet addiction treatment program for Chinese adolescents in Hong Kong. Adolescence. 2009;44(174 ):359–73.[PubMed]
72. Bai Y, Fan FM. The effects of group counseling on Internet-dependent college students. Chinese Mental Health Journal. 2007;21(4 ):247–50.
73. reSTART: Internet Addiction Recovery Program. First detox center for Internet addicts opens its doors: Creates solutions for computer related addictive behaviors. 2009. [[cited 2011 August 21]]. Available from: http: //www.netaddictionrecovery.com .
74. Lambert MJ, Morton JJ, Hatfield D, Harmon C, Hamilton S, Reid RC, et al. Administration and Scoring Manual for the OQ-45.2 (Outcome Measures) American Professional Credentialing Services L.L.C. 2004.